When is new radio too much radio?

Enough already! Over the last month or so, the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has been madly granting new radio station licences. And most of them are in communities that are already extremely well-serviced by an overdose of radio choices.

Just because it sounds like a good idea to put a radio station in "wee tiny town Canada" doesn't mean it actually makes sense. The logic seems to be, according to one radio station owner in "wee tiny town", that it's important to have local news and information. Yep, okay, sure. But unless you are an independently wealthy radio station owner doing it from the goodness of your heart, you are simply watering down the audience market for your advertisers.

As it is, I hear from innumerable small business owners that radio doesn't work. I always beg to differ with this opinion because radio does work, when you do it right. And part of doing it right is choosing a radio station that matches your audience definition. If the audience is spread over five radio stations instead of three - well, you can see that this becomes a nightmare of planning and budgeting. All these additional radio stations are just going to make it harder for a small business to make a reasonable buy that gets results.

As a marketing coach, I get to meet a lot of small business owners. In one local community, a number of the small business owners that attended a coaching session were quite frank in their dislike of buying their local radio station. They felt the music choices were erratic and didn't sit well with their potential customer.

As a result, I had a rather long conversation with radio station owner from "wee tiny town Canada". The biggest surprise to me during this conversation was the emphatic statement, "People don't listen to the radio for the music. They listen for the information." Well, yes that might be true if you are a talk or news station, but if you're going to play music you might want it to have some logical association with the audience you are trying to sell the local businesses.

And in reality if radio can't deliver results, then people will stop buying it. And when they stop buying it, people lose their jobs and the radio stations cease to exist. How does it make sense to saturate the market with loads of radio stations - either for the radio stations or the small businesses?

When less is definitely more

How many ads have you seen and heard where the advertiser tries to do too many things at once? Unfortunately, I've seen way too many over the last weeks. My focus on rural and small business has exposed me to print and audio/visual advertising that is over-designed, over-produced and completely unfocused.

If you want to make the most of your advertising, there is a very key thing to remember. Be focused, focused, focused.

Keep your message short and sweet. People today have very short attention spans, especially for advertising. You'll never successfully be all things to all people, so don't even try. Know your audience thoroughly and design your messages to speak clearly to them.

Don't mix your messages. Pick a topic and stay on it. The 30-second radio spot is great for this because you can only do a little bit in 30 seconds. But print ads and flyers can get away from you pretty quickly.

Make sure your designer understands the concept of minimalism. There's often no need for tons of illustrations, graphic effects, and there's definitely no need for a kazillion type styles and sizes. Trained designers know this. I realize that not everyone is working with a trained designer, and those companies can be spotted instantly through the over-design and clutter in their advertising.

Remember too that white space is easy on the eye. If your customers have to struggle to read your message, they'll just turn away. Be careful when using reversed-out type (white type on dark surface). Many type styles can't hold up under this treatment. Most especially script fonts.

Test all your print and audio/visual advertising with someone who doesn't know the message. If they don't get it quickly, then you need to modify.

Know your audience means save your money

I just finished reading a newspaper article about a government program for interest-free, forgivable loans. The director of municipal housing for London, Ontario was interviewed:

'Louise Stevens, London's director of municipal housing, said the program was well-publicized in London in lending institutions, libraries, realtors and the media.

"We promoted the heck out of it," she said.'

One of the conditions of this program, in which renters can get a loan for a downpayment on purchasing a house, is household income of $50,000 or less.

So let's take a look at the city's tactics in this "well-publicized" plan versus audience behaviours.

Families with less than $50,000 income are probably not hanging out at the bank. And a majority of folks under 40 years of age do their banking on-line so they're rarely in the bank, if ever. So using funds to promote this program in lending institutions should probably have been kept to a minimum. A nice message to the lending officers might have been enough on the off chance that someone making $50,000/year decided they could afford a house (never mind all the public relations nightmares going on in the US about housing costs and loans and the impact rising interests rates have had on people's ability to pay their mortgages - that has had so much play in the Canadian media that lower middle income families are likely stepping cautiously).

Libraries. Hmm. I love the library. Bought my house because the library is right next door. But I know I am an anomaly. Reading for fun is becoming less and less a popular hobby, especially with people in lower income and lower education brackets. Research is done online for those with a computer rather than wading through the stacks at the library. And in this time of over-packed schedules, I can't think of anyone in my experience intentionally wandering around the library to find adverts from the city or anyone else.

Would you have a chat with a realtor if you didn't think you could afford a house? Of course, they would want to be aware of the program, but again, not necessary to put much money under it.

And now the buggaboo of all buggaboos - the media. And by this, she means mainstream media. Newspapers and radio. Maybe even some television.

Newspaper readership has been deteriorating for over a decade. Partly because people are less interested in reading, partly because mainstream journalism has become an entertainment industry rather than a credible news source in many cases and finally because the internet allows people to streamline their experience with less newsprint in the house and less black smeary ink on their fingers.

Loads of statistics across the country show that newspaper readership goes up with higher education and household income. So, doesn't look like a favourable buy for households under $50,000.

And beware of misleading comments in the readership statistics of newspapers. London Free Press says that 71% of adults 25 - 49 read their newspaper each week (notice it doesn't say every day). Which properly translated means these people open the newspaper a minimum of once a week. So which section? How many of them only look at Friday's entertainment section? How many only look at the classifieds? Sports page? Lifestyle?

Radio is challenging at the best of times. Each market has more radio stations than you could possibly need. London has at least seven stations, not including all the stations from surrounding areas that spill into the market. Radio is terrific if you can really nail down the habits of your audience, but again you are trapped with figuring out when they are actually listening. No point in running ads when your audience isn't there.

And then television, one of the most challenging things to buy on a tight budget. London does have a local station, but with all the specialty channels and major networks, how many Londoners are actually watching? Not many.

So it is easy to criticize but is it easy to figure out what might have worked? How about an online component, even it is only a targeted ad on the newspaper's website? How about unaddressed admail directed to those neighbourhoods with the correct demographics? How about some kind of partnership with Walmart or Zellers? An insert for their shopping bags?

Municipality employees often make tactical decisions based on their own life experience, not through any solid research into the habits of their audience. Which is why so much municipal marketing money is wasted. And don't get me wrong - municipalities aren't the only ones who do this. Large corporations right down to the mom-and-pop corner store are frequently guilty of this.

Don't waste your marketing dollars. If you don't know the habits of your audience, find someone who does. And be open to new ways to talk to your audience.

"We promoted the heck out of it" is obviously a relative statement, but I certainly don't think the tactics she listed would equal promoting the heck out of anything.