Relevant messaging - what if your customer doesn't care?

The Canadian election on October 14th had the lowest voter turnout in Canadian election history. And yet, for many of the people who voted, it was considered the most important election in their lifetime. What went wrong?

Apparently the majority of the population just didn't care. (I am a firm believer that if you don't vote, you don't get an opinion about the state of the government later on.) They were getting mixed messages from the media, backtracking from the politicians, irritating telemarketers and door-knocking canvassers.

There was too much negative commentary from the parties as well. And here's a very important point for small business that would have put a different tone on the election. Spend your time and your money telling me what is good and unique about you; don't spend my time just yapping about the things that are wrong with the competition. Yes, yes, each of the parties purchased advertising in which they spouted their positive attributes, but we all know that media coverage gets more attention and belief than any paid advertising. In the end, all the political leaders looked lame and some even looked childish.

I had a conversation right before the election with my local MP. We had a great chat about how the Conservatives are their own worst enemy when it comes to messaging. What they mean to say and what gets published in the media are often two very different things. And I can't help but think that if they actually had a marketer, instead of just a whole slew of public relations folks, their messages might be a little tighter. Sure they use a marketing firm to produce their lovely paid advertising, but where is the marketing guidance for the every day mess?

The complicated stories that were the underlying issues of the election were too complicated to resolve in speeches or one-minute ads. The environment, the economy and leadership abilities all require a consistent, understandable message - one that isn't up for media interpretation.

And small business needs that relevant, clear message as well. You can spend a lot of money uselessly if your messages aren't relevant to a person's life. You can help people care through education and exposure, but neither one of these things is an instant return. Are you selling a $30,000 item to an area with high unemployment and a fear of job loss? You might want to check in on the relevance of your messages.

Politicians are fun to watch because they have to educate, get exposure and convince people their "product" is the best, all in a short period of time. Jack Layton hasn't changed his "product" in years - so if it wasn't relevant to people before, why would it be relevant now? Elizabeth May personifies what everyone feared of the Green Party - fanatical extremist. That has a pretty limited relevance. Stephen Harper obviously had the most relevance for the voters - a calmness in the face of economic explosion, a leader who admits mistakes rather than blaming others. He has his flaws but he came closest to being relevant to Canadians. And Stephane Dion? Well, poor Mr. Dion just didn't have a clue. And all the Liberals are equally to blame. They voted him into the leadership position and supported the Green Shift. Don't let any of them convince you that Mr. Dion did that all by himself. Relevance, gentleman ( and lady). If you want voters out, you better find out what is relevant to your customers. And that's us. Every single person in Canada is your customer.